Justin’s thoughts (and a theory) on the next iPhone

Thanks to Gizmodo, images have been surfacing about the form factor of the next-generation iPhone, with specs to go with them. I must say, looking at these images is akin to viewing the million-dollar show cars on display about a year before the production version hits the streets. While it is much easier to change something last-minute on a phone, instead of coordinating multiple factories manufacturing thousands of components for a vehicle, I think the two month (or so) window until the next iPhone is released can correlate to a year in the automobile world.

When I look at this device, a few things come to mind very quickly. First off, I wish it were an aluminum unibody design — essentially a shrunken iPad. I understand the radio/cellular interference this could cause, but aesthetically, it’s a personal preference.

I like the front-facing camera, love the fact that there appears to be a flash to go with the better rear-facing camera, and I really dig the slab of glass without any metal surrounding it on the front screen face (floating glass? Can I copyright that?). The additional noise-cancellation microphone on the top is a greatly appreciated feature as well.

What strikes me as odd, and adds to my notion that this is a pre-production model, are the seams in the aluminum itself. Not to sound blunt, but those things don’t simply find their way into Apple products. Nor do the separate volume buttons. If one of them doubles as a camera button, so be it, but why wouldn’t it just be the “up” button? (Hold your iPhone sideways. It fits your hands when you press the volume rocker, doesn’t it?) Details like these do not slide by in Apple’s world of hyper-attention to detail.

Lastly, and possibly most importantly in my mind, is the screen size. We live in a world where 3.7″ screens have become a benchmark for almost all “halo” smartphones (Droid, Nexus One), and where HTC can throw out 4.3″ screens like nobody’s business. So then why this thing is so (relatively) small?

To quote the immortal Lester Bangs, “Here’s a theory for you to disregard. Completely.” And this theory has everything to do with the display size, among other things. Hear me out:

The prototype is a tremendous gadget that will surely turn the world on its head as soon as it hits the shelves this summer, but I don’t think this device is all there is to it. Apple has a tendency to surprise the world, and Steve Jobs would not allow his “One more thing…” to be fully broadcast all over the world two months in advance. (Jobs has a penchant for the dramatic. If you’ve watched his keynotes, you know he gets a kick out of introducing the most buzzed-about technology by saying, “Oh, and one more thing…”)

So here’s a theory to ponder (or disregard): If the device pictured above is authentic, and I believe it is, it may not be just “one more thing” — it could be one of a couple things, among them the iPhone Pro.

I think the next series of iPhones may come as a pair — one with a 3.5″ screen, the other somewhere around 4.0″–4.3″ — with the unit pictured above as the baby brother. To me, that’s more likely than the prototype (with smaller display) being the only version. Think about it: In today’s world of touchscreen smartphones, smaller is not better, and size truly does matter. Cupertino has to have noticed what’s been going on with the incredible popularity of handsets like the HD2 on T-Mobile (it’s a Windows 6.5 phone, people). I’m not an engineer, but it would seem logical to make the smaller version first, to make sure everything fits, then build it out from there.

The “Pro” theory would also follow with the rest of the Apple lineup, with bigger and better specs, not just for screen size and resolution, but also storage. (In the past, 40- 80- and 120-GB drives in iPods weren’t feasible for size reasons, so they had to go with 8- 16- and 32-GB. But after four years of development, this kind of storage is not out of reach.)

The next few months will be a very exciting time for all those in Apple-land, and this “industry of cool” we live in is set for even more change. While some people are still questioning whether the prototype really is the next iPhone, or if Apple succeeded in one of the greatest rope-a-dopes in the history of technology, I’ve got my eyes fixed on four little words: iPhone and iPhone Pro.

Can’t you hear Steve Jobs saying that in front of a captive audience?

Tags: , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

i dont like the idea of a touchscreen being too big like the htc hd2, that screen is huge, which i dont like and it feels really big. i wouldnt mind a screen which is 3.7" to 4"

iPhone Pro? You've got to be kidding me.

And this is why I'm headi Flash Player not available for your device Apple restricts use of technologies required by products like Adobe® Flash® Player. Until Apple eliminates these restrictions, Adobe cannot provide Flash Player for the iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. Copyright © 2010 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is why I'm heading for Sprint!!!!!

If that really is the how the iP4 will look, I'll get one. I hate the design, feel and look of the last 3 hence I never even thought about buying an idiot phone but this one has me thinking twice.

Personally, I'm happy with 3.5 inch display, but it would be nicer to have a 3.7 inch. I'm not really liking the 4.3 inch ones, but up till 4 inch is great, and that is what i am hoping for. Apple knows better than anyone that people don't like smaller screens, and I'm really hoping the price is less than $1000 AUD, so at least i can afford one after a few months of hard work ;).

I couldn't agree with you more. I find it disappointing that they seem to use to much black-blank real estate on the phone, like the previous devices when lots of that black-blank space can make up for about .2" to .3" (more inches) on the phone(s) the thought of this next generation iPhone of having a smaller screen is quiet absurd.

Gizmodo covered that little part of the story. It would make sense to just about everyone familiar with MobileMe that the GPS function would have been used, but so far, the SDK for iPhone 4.0 software does not support that function.

Here's the reason why it's not the next iPhone but a prototype. When it went missing, apple, quickly bricked the phone by using mobile me. They then asked for it to be returned by whomever had it. Finding out that gizmodo had it, they sent some generic letter. REALLY? Why wouldn't apple / steve Jobs just use the mobile me tracking to locate the lost iPhone and go get it instead of playing dumb. In my opinion, apple purposely leaked the prototype to gauge design interest.

thank god im not the only person who thinks this. i thought i was losing my mind. yes the aluminum with the seams is hideous and does not scream apple. they are known for smooth unibody designs...in my opinion this one seems cheap so hopefully your right and is the prototype. and the buttons i also completely agree. very strange. but what ticks me off most is the screen too. hopefully your right because i was waiting for the new iPhone knowing of the front facing camera and LED display rumors. so hopefully LED doesnt mean i have to sacrifice screen size (which makes no sense to me or apple i hope), and your right about the Pro. we can only pray

i like your idea on this and you point out many great factors and points i like that well all in all i like the device but i know they can do way better