LTE capable iPhone 5 all but confirmed by Korean carriers

Let’s face it, if there’s one rumor – among all the dross that’s been flying off the rumor mill this year – that stands on its own as being virtually guaranteed, it’s that the iPhone 5 will feature an LTE chipset. The new iPad launched earlier this year hosting the 4G capable circuitry, except it was only compatible with North American bandwidths.

The latest comes from the Korea Times, which reports:

SK Telecom and KT are in talks to offer long-term evolution (LTE) connectivity on Apple’s next handset, tentatively named the iPhone 5, officials from the companies said Wednesday. [...]

The new iPhone should feature fourth-generation (4G) LTE support, which will put more of a strain on the battery than the current iPhone 4S’s third-generation (3G) capabilities. It’s widely expected that the new smartphone’s arrival will be announced on Sept. 12 and launched on Sept. 21.

Although it’s not surprising that the 6th generation is likely to be equipped with 4G components, it’s interesting to hear that the bandwidths could be much more international friendly. Great news for those countries that already have it set up. Unlike the UK, where squabbling over spectrum will seemingly ensure that we don’t get any 4G flavor until everyone’s riding on hoverboards.

Via: AppAdvice, Korea Times

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I had 4G LTE in March of 2011.  Revolutionary.

Applefangirl 13 pts

Not really Jeff.. It didn't really exist in 2011.  :P

According to the way apple named the iphone 4 the next generation iphone will be called the iphone 6, NOT 5 YOU RETARDS!

A little harsh, don't you think?

AjentTrue 5 pts

@Tim Hounds How do you figure that? Looking at the history of Apples naming it would make sense for them to call it the iPhone 5 (3, 3G, 3GS, 4, 4S)... Your argument would have a little more credit if you were to suggest that it was going to be called iPhone 4GS (or something similar), given Apples history of having three versions of each number. Also, you use of English is incorrect. Retard is defined as to delay something, hold it back or otherwise impede progress. By the very definition of the word 'retard', your comment is retarded.

 AjentTrue  Tim I agree with Tim, although your comment is quite rude.  But first there was the iphone 2G (edge), then the 3G, then the 3GS.  In terms of "model" the iPhone 4 is the third one made by apple, but they called it the 4th physical build of the iphone.  If they follow this pattern, then technically the newest iPhone should be called the iPhone 6 because it will be the 6th "build" of the iPhone. 

 AjentTrue  Tim Sorry that should say: "but they called it the iPhone 4 because it was 4th physical build of the iPhone."

Applefangirl 13 pts

 AjentTrue  Tim I have to agree that Tim was quite rude.. but I personally don't think it matters what the phone will be called. BUT.. Apple loves to be unpredictable.. They could also call it "The New Iphone"  Regardless.. Tim has issues! :)

TiP_Cam 64 pts moderator

Also, iPhone 4 is one phone. None of the others followed your naming method. To pretend a sequence exists when - in fact - only one iPhone in five was named by choosing the generation number isn't exactly well thought through now is it? 4, 4S, 5 makes sequential sense even if the iPhone 5 isn't the 5th generation. Not like it matters anyway. We use it because it's the most common term for the next iPhone. We can't keep writing "iPhone 5/6/the new iPhone" in every title now can we?