iPhone 5 delayed due to Samsung feud?

Apple shocked the tech industry this passed summer by not releasing the iPhone 5. Nearly everyone was sure that—after a longer wait than normal— they would release something revolutionary and truly magical. Let’s just say that the 4S, which is more or less the same as the 4 (except with a witty personal assistant), is not that. So why did Apple opt for the 4S instead of a 5?

The word on the street now is that the Apple initially did plan to wow us with something amazing. However, they were delayed by a part that lacked the stability their iDevices are known for. Apple allegedly assigned the part to a Taiwanese manufacturing company instead of Samsung. Apparently the piece that this company made failed the standard stability tests, but with Sammy and the like cranking out products like there is no tomorrow—seriously, by the time I can say the name of an android device, there is a new one on the shelves—Apple had to release a new product to stay in the game.

Samsung is not denying these rumors either.  One Samsung Electronics official gave this statement:

“As far as we understand, Apple newly assigned production of two key components for its iPhone 5 and iPad 3 to a Taiwanese company, but these showed problems such as overheating during final tests.”

Apple has reportedly pushed back the release of the iPad 3 for the same reason. It was rumored to be coming out in March of next year, but may be pushed back 3 months. Apple, since the beginning of the year have been trying to assign parts to Taiwanese companies instead of Samsung. They also, as you know may know, have been slamming Sammy lawsuit after lawsuit in an effort to pull ahead in the tablet and smartphone market.

Considering the performance and stability of Apple’s iPhone and iPad that currently use Samsung’s chips, changing manufacturers may not be the wisest move. In my opinion, they need to iron out their differences and get back to making good products that will mutually benefit them both. I am all for protecting your intellectual property, but If you have to sacrifice your product quality to do so, that is a no-go.

Should Apple find a new parts source or come back to Samsung? Chime in below or, as always, you can send me a tweet @ArmoredFowl.

Via: The Hankyoreh

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Actually Samsung is a big money monopoly in Korea. They make heavy duty machinery and trucks. Truck trailers and tractors. They even build ships and tugboats. They have home appliances and home theatre equipment. Building a bridge is more profitable than all the cell phones ever sold.Their phone division is just a small entity of their overall income. Although it has recently boomed and is more profitable than ever, it only generates about a 1/10th of their revenue. 

Apple should build their own components so they have that extra bit of product control, plus long term they will end up saving money and then will be able to have everything at their standards

I do not like Apple's marketing tactic. While they have ability to provide better equipment to public, they try to sell piece meal at  a time IPOD, IPOD with low res. camera (trying to sell old left over parts), IPONE 2,3,3s,4,4S. Their plan was to milk the public all the way. When their competitor came out with best available tech. Apple had to also introduce better equipment skipping milking sales. If they do not come up with far superior 5 next year, I am dumping all my stock...............

Technically Samsung is feeding apple.

Work together. Hey apple u see this,yeah well this is me telling you to quit going ahead instead of making good products!!

The only people shocked in the "tech industry" you talk about are the blog sites! Anyone with a brain new what was comming.

Let's see. iPhone 3G. Then iPhone 3GS. Then iPhone 4. Then... hmmn, what would be next? An iPhone 4S? Limit retooling costs and milk the most successful smartphone for another 9-12 months. For an iPhone 5, not only is true 4G coverage almost non-existent, the tech on the 4G chipset wasn't there--not at Samsung, not anywhere--unless you were willing to go fat form factor or 4-hr bat life. AAPL has, time and time again, chosen to not compromise overall user experience in order to be on the bleeding edge. The first iPhone was 2G even though 3G chips were available at the time. I don't see anything new here in this paradigm that would lead to the conclusion that AAPL's release cycle is being altered by a feud over IP with Samsung. AAPL appears to be sticking to the same tenets of their successful past.

*cough* Motorola made such a device. Motorola Droid Razr, small and has a good battery life. 

They didn't introduce the new iphone 5 because they new steve jobs was going down hill. They are saving it for later so that they have a new device to introduce later while they recover from the loss of steve jobs

What are the 2 parts in question? Supposedly Apple was going to move its A5 development to TSMC. However that wouldn't impact whether they released an iPhone 4S or 5.  Could have impacted timing, but not the phone's feature set...