iTunes Match: piracy plus or protection?

iTunes Match is undoubtedly one of the most controversial services ever released by Apple. Apple recently announced its iCloud service which allows users to upload their music purchased from iTunes to the cloud for free. They can then access their songs anywhere and anytime on any of their iOS devices. However, iCloud only works with music that has been purchased from their music store, so any music that you have from CDs (or other unsavory sources) are excluded. But, Apple being Apple, created another service called iTunes Match which allows users to scan their music and have it “mirrored” into the cloud for $24.99 a year.

So, here is the problem. For $25 bucks a year, you can match your music with the same song from iTunes but at 256-Kbps iTunes Plus quality. That means for some who acquired the music illegally—like torrents—they can get higher quality versions of all their music for only a few dollars. Now let’s do the math. 50 songs from an illegal source at 25 dollars a year mean each song is 50 cents. Now suppose you got those same 50 songs from iTunes at 99 cents each. That’s 50 dollars and that’s all you get. It seems to me that this is a win for the pirates, no?

But is this also stopping pirates? With the example above, it is hard to find an argument against piracy, but at least it monetizes it. Pirates are still going to have to pay to have their music in the cloud and in a way, the 50 cents a song is a whole lot better for the music companies who have been getting absolutely nothing. If it is any consolation, whether Apple came up with iTunes Match or not, pirates would have still kept on pirating. It wasn’t as if this new service was going to make them see the light or anything.

In any case, this move was extremely smart on Apple’s part. They realized that traditional music sales are dying so they came up with a more future-proof way that is almost subscription-like. So, what do you think about iTunes Match? Let me know in the comments below or send me a tweet on twitter.

Please note that all of the things I said were for informational purposes only. Please don’t steal (pirate) music. Today’s iPhone is not liable if a big music company comes knocking at your door.

Tags: , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

exactly the point is people don't have 50 songs... Nowadays, anyone with a 16Gb+ phone has 2000-5000 songs. By your calculations that is 0.0125-0.005$/song, 25$ which is still Apple income. THIS is probably their logic. ~200 million people download free songs ~1000songs a person 0.005 x 1000 x 200,000,000 is still 1billion dollars. View this 1billion dollars are re-couped losses distributed amongst music artists, and Apple. I support it..

Technically, if I were to download songs illegally, I could use the iMatch service for 25 bucks a year but that doesn't mean that I would pay a dime for my songs from lets say, MP3Rocket. I could download thousands of songs for free, and just pay apple 25 dollars to host my songs in my dark and evil Cloud. The artist's won't be making any money at all period.

Now I understand. I agree with you. It is a true rip off, somewhat, to the Artist but in the long run its a way for Apple to get others to use their service that they have created. Plus... its a good deal for the consumer. More songs, at a cheaper price, for better quality. Heck yeah!

I don't know what Apple's exact deal is, but I'm thinking that the artists get a cut from the 25 dollars.In any case, we win regardless so I don't really care what goes on behind the scenes.

Exactly! Truth be told, most of them don't need any more money.

True, but they did earn it...

Not for me. I kept all of my 300 or so CDs, which were all ripped at 192kbps or better. The only limit I am hitting is the 5-device ceiling. Let's see -- there is an iPod per car (3), plus one for the whole-house stereo, and an iTouch for traveling (sorry, no iPhone for me). There are two MacBooks and one iPad in the house, but not synced to my iTunes. Blackberry Desktop Manager let's me sync as many non-DRM'd songs as I want to a separate chip, which seems to circumvent the 5-device limit. $25 to duplicate 4,000 songs on the iCloud at a slightly-higher kbps? Really only makes sense to me if I have more than 5 iOS devices, though I would rather pay something to get the 5-device limit removed.

You're damn right it is! And it is great! My (now small; cut music I so not listen to) is pretty meager at only 2,774 songs. But imagine if I'd paid for all those! $2,000 in music? No thank you! No way am I paying that much for music. Anyways. I love it. I am going to use the heck out of it! And artists get their money all-the-while.

My question is, can they tell if a song was pirated? And will they pursue it? Will iTunes match be private? Will they information and music choices to anyone?

As far as I can tell, they won't be able to tell if it was obtained illegally. As for privacy, I think it is just between you and your cloud. No one else knows what type of music you are uploading.